<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blogging Projects in Haringey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Just another Edublogs.org weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:40:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on STM Update by skambalu</title>
		<link>http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org/2007/07/02/stm-update/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>skambalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org/2007/07/02/stm-update/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d forgotten about this site!! And the comments! I haven&#039;t had any like that again, but I think that&#039;s a good idea, to have a policy of referring comments to home. Unfortunately, pupils can put in a false name and email address, so it&#039;s not always clear who has sent them! I think once they realise the comments are not printed then they forget about the shock factor and get on with it a bit. That&#039;s why moderation is useful though!

(I&#039;ve just looked at the date - 12 July 2007 - I&#039;ve only just received an email saying that it was posted!! Bizarre!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d forgotten about this site!! And the comments! I haven&#8217;t had any like that again, but I think that&#8217;s a good idea, to have a policy of referring comments to home. Unfortunately, pupils can put in a false name and email address, so it&#8217;s not always clear who has sent them! I think once they realise the comments are not printed then they forget about the shock factor and get on with it a bit. That&#8217;s why moderation is useful though!</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve just looked at the date &#8211; 12 July 2007 &#8211; I&#8217;ve only just received an email saying that it was posted!! Bizarre!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STM Update by Judy</title>
		<link>http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org/2007/07/02/stm-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingprojects.edublogs.org/2007/07/02/stm-update/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think you are right about the comments and the earlier that you introduce it then better in terms of pupil response.  I would be tempted to copy the inappropriate comments into a word document -anonymous of course and then do a session of these and how peoploe would feel if they received comments like this or if a policy was introduced that inappropriate comments would be sent home.  I don&#039;t know what the comments are like but if a student wouldn&#039;t be prepared to write it on paper and put their name to it then a sanction should be applied.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right about the comments and the earlier that you introduce it then better in terms of pupil response.  I would be tempted to copy the inappropriate comments into a word document -anonymous of course and then do a session of these and how peoploe would feel if they received comments like this or if a policy was introduced that inappropriate comments would be sent home.  I don&#8217;t know what the comments are like but if a student wouldn&#8217;t be prepared to write it on paper and put their name to it then a sanction should be applied.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
